Key takeaways:

  • October is historically the worst month for stocks, but November and December have performed well.
  • Reviewing the historical record of stocks in October and the fourth quarter may offer clarity about the equity market’s path forward.

10/09/2024 – A few weeks ago, I wrote about the seasonality of stock performance, particularly the historically poor track record of stocks in September. This was following last month’s volatile start, when the S&P 500® Index made history by falling 4.2% during the first week of September—the worst first week of any month on record for the benchmark index.

However, as the rest of last month showed, seasonality does not have to dictate outcomes. Stock investors moved past the early September volatility and concentrated on robust second-quarter earnings growth, positive economic momentum, the beginning of the Federal Reserve’s easing cycle, and falling interest rates. The S&P 500 finished September up 2.1% and 5.9% for the third quarter, marking its fourth consecutive quarter of gains.

Notably, market leadership shifted in September from mega-cap tech stocks to more defensive sectors like utilities and real estate. The S&P 500® Equal Weight Index outperformed the S&P 500 by about 4% for the third quarter, while small-cap stocks, as measured by the S&P SmallCap 600® Index, gained over 10%. This broadening of market performance underscored the resilience and adaptability of the current bull market. 

Just as investors heard a lot about September’s notorious volatility, they may hear similar warnings about October, especially with the presidential elections looming in November. This is an opportune time for investors to remember that volatility is an inherent aspect of investing, not a defect. Reviewing the historical performance of stocks in October and the fourth quarter may offer investors clarity about the equity market’s path forward.

It is common for the market to churn in October, especially following a strong year-to-date performance heading into Q4. Since 1950, the average return for the S&P 500 in October during presidential election years has been approximately -0.9%, making it the worst month of the year. The accompanying table shows the eleven best nine-month year-to-date returns for the S&P 500 since 1950. (As the data shows, 2024 is in the top ten.)

S&P 500® Index best nine-month year-to-date performance since 1950
Year to date through September October 4Q Full calendar year
1987 33% -22% -23% 2%
1954 30% -2% 11% 45%
1997 28% -3% 2% 31%
1995 27% 0% 5% 34%
1989 26% -3% 1% 27%
1958 25% 3% 10% 38%
1975 22% 6% 8% 32%
1955 21% -3% 4% 26%
2024 21%  TBD TBD TBD
1967 20% -3% 0% 20%
2019 19% 2% 9% 29%

Source: Factset, Nationwide Investment Management Group

Despite the exceptional year-to-date performance during these years, October’s performance has been quite variable. 1987 was bad because of October 19, or “Black Monday”—still the worst day ever for the S&P 500 in percentage terms, with a drop of over 20% in a single trading session. However, the good news is that November and December have historically performed well, especially in election years, as the uncertainty around the election outcome eventually dissipates.

Signs, statistics, and seasonal trends often bombard investors. The ensuing cacophony of bullish and bearish voices can be quite confusing. However, for those with a long-term horizon and a solid financial plan, the rewards can be substantial. Despite warnings that September would bring market losses, the S&P 500 had its best start to the first nine months of the year, since 1997 through the third quarter. This serves as a powerful reminder of the wisdom of staying invested over time, rather than attempting to time the market.

Author(s)

Mark Hackett, CFA, CMT

Chief of Investment Research, Nationwide Investment Management Group

Mark Hackett is the Chief of Investment Research for Nationwide’s Investment Management Group, bringing more than 20 years of experience in the asset management industry to the role.

Trending articles

In the coming years, more people will begin to think about the costs of health care in retirement and the possibility of needing long-term care (LTC) in the future, especially as the number of Americans reaching age 65 hits an all-time high this year.

Considerations for financial professionals on supporting retirees through economic uncertainty.

The Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) is critical for financial professionals to understand.

Disclaimers

This material is not a recommendation to buy or sell a financial product or to adopt an investment strategy. Investors should discuss their specific situation with their financial professional.

Except where otherwise indicated, the views and opinions expressed are those of Nationwide as of the date noted, are subject to change at any time and may not come to pass.

S&P 500® Index: An unmanaged, market capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks of leading large-cap U.S. companies in leading industries; it gives a broad look at the U.S. equities market and those companies’ stock price performance.

S&P 500® Equal Weight Index (EWI): The equal-weight version of the widely-used S&P 500 Index that includes the same constituents as the capitalization weighted S&P 500, but each company in the S&P 500 EWI is allocated a fixed weight - or 0.2% of the index total at each quarterly rebalance.

S&P SmallCap 600® Index (S&P 600): a stock market index established by Standard & Poor’s that covers roughly the small-cap range of American stocks, using a capitalization-weighted index.

S&P Indexes are trademarks of Standard & Poor’s and have been licensed for use by Nationwide Fund Advisors LLC. The Products are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Standard & Poor’s and Standard & Poor’s does not make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in the Product.